On the first episode of the second annual Midnight Writer News JFK Month, researcher and author Dr. Walt Brown joins S.T. Patrick to discuss the JFK assassination. Dr. Brown addresses his own entrance into the community, Lee Harvey Oswald’s chances for acquittal had their been a trial, his correspondence with Vincent Bugliosi, whether Clay Shawn owned a 1962 Rambler station wagon, the Russian presence surrounding the Oswalds in Dallas, creating the Global Index to the JFK Assassination, compiling the Master Chronology, Jay Harrison and the the destinations of Harrison’s files, Dr. Brown’s last conference, his view of the conferences, and some of the more…. unique…. conference experiences (e.g. Harrison Edward Livingstone).
Dr. Walt Brown is the author of The People v. Lee Harvey Oswald, Treachery in Dallas, The Warren Omission, the Global Index to the JFK Assassination, the Master Chronology of the JFK Assassination, and many more articles and essays. He is currently the publisher of JFK/Deep Politics Quarterly. For inquiries on ordering the Index, Chronology, or JFKDPQ, Dr. Brown has asked that those interested contact him by email at kiasjfk (at) aol (dot) com.
Dr. Brown’s essay “Did Clay Shaw Own a 1962 Rambler?” can be found here.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
ST, I think that sometimes it is not You or the show but sometimes the person being interviewed that displays their opinion, frequently in the things they don’t say or investigate. I believe that some listeners, because they’ve Been trained by the government, either wittingly or not wittingly, to not listen to “the other side” point of view. This method is much easier than trying to fight or argue the points, theories, or “facts” of a situation. This methodology has to be unlearned.and it is literally the modus operandi (sp) of the mainstream media in their thrust to help the deep state divide and eventually conquer the American not just populous the the very concept of America which also must be taken down and/or demonized at every opportunity before it can be replaced with INGSOC globalism.
Phillip, we determined from day one to NOT be a combative show, because there are those shows that do already exist. There are also shows that serve to tell you whom NOT to believe. They do a wonderful job. I’m not criticizing those shows at all. I like them, and I listen to them. But I am an educator at heart – trained as an educator. It is my desire to allow people to talk about what they do know and what they do believe. Then it is the listeners job to decide what and whom to believe. I want to bring the researcher to you and I want t be fair to every single person that takes the time out of their life to spend with us and with you. In that respect, this show will always be polite. I’m not sure if there is a show out there like ours – one that allows the guest the room to speak until they are finished. This show is about the guests and what they have to say. It will always be that. I intentionally do not “fight or argue the points, theories, or facts.” That is intentional. I allow other guests to do that and I allow you the listener to do that through your own research. Guests often contradict other guests. That’s why the show is a whole and it isn’t just a series of one episodes. I view it as a large text. Within that, you absolutely see guests arguing each other’s points. Thank you for writing in. Please stay in touch and keep listening. I wish you peace. — S.T. Patrick
Was there an autopsy on Oswald? If so, has anyone ever read it? Shooting someone in the stomach with a .38 is not much of a way to kill him. I wonder if the medical staff did him in? There must have been an autopsy, as it was a violent death. Can someone get a copy of it and check it out?